The below is an off-site archive of all tweets posted by @lopp ever

March 31st, 2016

@oocBlog @kristovatlas All the more surprising that during periods of full blocks, some miners prioritize low fee consolidation txns.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to oocBlog

BrendanEich New site design: brave.com

New blog post from @_mtr and me on the BTC-based, anonymous Brave Ledger: brave.com/blogpost_3.html

via Twitter Web Client (retweeted on 8:12 PM, Mar 31st, 2016 via Twitter Web Client)

@kristovatlas I wonder if @oocBlog has ever attempted to reverse engineer mining pool prioritization rules…

via Twitter Web Client in reply to kristovatlas

@SlackHQ Already did; apparently being signed into a dozen teams with lots of channels on each requires a ton of memory…

via Twitter Web Client in reply to SlackHQ

“Where’s the warrant canary in the Reddit transparency report?”
“We’ve been advised not to say anything about it.”
https://t.co/07Ln7t00d8

via Twitter Web Client

@masonic_tweets Thou shalt not use the blockchain for “cloud mining” dust payouts.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to masonic_tweets

This leads to the question: do miners prioritize low fee transactions with many inputs and few outputs b/c they consolidate the UTXO set?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

3 recent full blocks with < 800 txns due to low fee large data txns:
https://t.co/rOryBzNl75
https://t.co/4dA0wd25Wg
https://t.co/5Q96fQBppB

via Twitter Web Client

@lykle Not necessarily sent via bitcoin p2p network; I suspect lots of miners have private APIs

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lykle

@lykle Someone could send them directly to miner, or perhaps there are enough nodes relaying nonstandard txns that they propagated normally.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lykle

@1Cal83 @DonutShorts @pmarca Federal regulations make banks not want to touch marijuana revenues.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to 1Cal83

It’s only one phone.
It’s only sixty three phones. https://t.co/zEvRPIPt88
It’s only hundreds of phones per city. https://t.co/wsVUETpmXe

via Twitter Web Client

Bitcoin Core’s scaling roadmap projected an April release date for Segregated Witness. Will they make it?

via Twitter Web Client

.@OPENDIME == first bitcoin bearer bond. Great for privately trading batches of “investment” coins. Off-chain for limitless scalability!

via Twitter Web Client

ErikVoorhees Beautiful 3d visualization of the Bitcoin blockchain - balls are transactions occurring in real time. bitbonkers.com

via Twitter Web Client (retweeted on 1:22 PM, Mar 31st, 2016 via Twitter Web Client)

Study by @el33th4xor, @socrates1024, @ittayeyal & others argues that block sizes up to 4 MB are safe for Bitcoin. https://t.co/MIn2Ax5zEz

via Twitter Web Client

You’d think the poisson distribution of bitcoin blocks would balance out, but it’s a throughput net negative b/c fast blocks aren’t filled.

via Twitter Web Client

@OPENDIME Will there be any way to back up an opendime? I’m guessing not, since that could pose a problem for its cash-like attributes.

via Twitter Web Client