Someone’s being naughty & maxing out bandwidth by requesting large blocks in a loop. And they have a message. pic.twitter.com/pek9iE0wwl
@Benathon @Technom4ge It’s possible if you are spending a lot of low value outputs, creating a transaction with a large data size.
Explaining “high fees” to users who collect dusty outputs generally doesn’t make them happier. Lightning Network will enable us to fix this.
Bitcoin fees being disconnected from value sent is great when you can send $1,000,000 for $0.10 but not so much when sending $10 costs $3.
@morcosa Hm, but shouldn’t all 0.12 nodes be affected roughly the same? None of my others saw this spike - did any of yours?
mikebelshe Been blogging for 10yrs. First time I got DDoS’d is after my block size posts. What does this tell us?
RT @khannib: Bitcoin blocks are fuller than ever. https://t.co/nEraQqztZT https://t.co/ai53l7dmtr
Fun @ethereumproject stats:
3.9% of all ether is stored in contracts
13.3% of all ether is held by @Poloniex https://t.co/3fKvxpB7L2
n1ckler Ethereum app post-mortem shows how simple contracts can contain subtle bugs due to gas limits
kingoftheether.com/postmortem.html
@morcosa My statoshi node jacked up 2 block target fee estimate 12 hours ago but other nodes still show 44,000… https://t.co/vQ3H6QiBQp