@pa49 No special defenses are needed against “infiltrators” as long as there is public discourse. Suppressing debate is a slippery slope.
@aantonop And yet their code is open source. It would be such a shame if someone were to fork it…
@ImpossibleBTC @brian_armstrong You should probably start over at the beginning. Note the title - it’s not e-gold. bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
@LaurentMT Right, it’s irrelevant as to which path is optimal. If an opposing idea is so terrible, it should not require underhanded tactics
Coercion, suppression of information, interference with public discourse. These are not tactics employed by parties acting in good faith.
RT @masonic_tweets: Bitcoin in 2015 - A Summary by @bencxr https://t.co/wNhHGjE2kW
blockchain #Bitcoin news: milestones, remittances, & a new age of practicality ow.ly/WlWYb @PopSci @lopp @JoTurkishWeekly @timesofindia
Despite progress made at Scaling Bitcoin, the community schism isn’t improving. https://t.co/1M4vvoRkSr https://t.co/Ae0ADyxNPE