BitGo BitGo responds to customer demands by supporting increased block sizes. ow.ly/Rn16m #BIP101 #Bitcoin
@DigiEconomist Still waiting on @dattnetwork
/r/Bitcoin moderators have implemented CSS to conceal their censorship and completely alter the meaning of comments. https://t.co/5QiXG1tS6A
@badslinky Nope, waiting to see actual code.
RT @DanSpuller: NC Bitcoin Enthusiasts Rally for Better Cryptocurrency Legislation | @ExitEvent http://t.co/QKpP65paCV @rcsherwo @Bill_Warn…
@mikestable I don’t think that’s what pugs were designed for. RTFM!
@Satoshi_N_ Last I checked, @ButtCoin doesn’t even /have/ an exchange rate. Come back when you create something valuable.
@pierebel It’s unlikely because the median of miner votes would have to be to double the hard cap every 3 months.
“Multisig on steroids using tree signatures” via @pwuille https://t.co/oeL1XIvdwx
I got to demo this on @MyceliumCom at @Cryptolina. Great stuff. https://t.co/IpwsaCwIwM
@pierebel Updating p2p code won’t cause a hard fork, though not updating your node would cause you to reject blocks > 32 MB.
@pierebel I believe further modifications would be required; BIP101 would give us 4 years to make the mods & test them.
BIP101: miners create fee market by setting individual soft caps and competing against other miners as hard cap grows to 8GB by 2036.
BIP100: miners create fee market by voting on adjustable system-wide hard cap that maxes out at 32MB. Unlikely, but could reach 32MB in 1yr.
@01101O10 xtnodes.com is back and better than ever. Don’t forget xt.coin.dance; good luck taking them all down.