@ddahlke Getting the kid hooked early?
If you’re offended when I say “we” then you should just move along - I clearly wasn’t talking about you. Onward! https://t.co/6kT7UFb6F0
RT @brianchoffman: I just published “Cypherpunk tears are shed for Bitcoin†https://t.co/cOBQLWyhMZ
@Aquentson @bitcom21 @ryanxcharles My scaling views have been the same for past two years. It’s not black and white. https://t.co/iOPMVgkLJX
@Aquentson @bitcom21 @ryanxcharles If you want to increase your credibility, recognize and avoid stating speculation and slander as fact.
@_brocardo looks like ~6%
@k9ert Neat! That’s definitely doable if all the stats you want are available via RPC. With Statoshi I wanted to expose internals of nodes.
First Bitcoin ATM in Durham, NC! ðŸpic.twitter.com/q4QyDhyXPqXPq
@GeminiDotCom @jrmoreau If you begin your tweets with the user’s name, they won’t get broadcast to all of your followers.
@Aquentson @ryanxcharles A “Bitcoin Core attack?” Proof of attacker’s identity, please.
@JihanWu @Satoshi_N_ 忌寒您好，硬分å‰å¯¹ä½ æ¥è¯´å¯èƒ½å¾ˆç®€å•ï¼Œä½†æ˜¯å¯¹ç¤¾åŒºå…¶ä»–æˆå’˜å¹¶ä¸ç®€å•. 如果感兴趣å¯ä»¥ç§ä¸‹èŠ.
@Beautyon_ @jamesldamico @bitcoinyuri Yes, as I covered my latest @coindesk article there are cult-like properties at play.
Wanted: a service / daemon that checks all your historical blog posts daily and notifies you when a link breaks.
@BrantlyMillegan I clarified my views on forum moderation/censorship here: https://t.co/Hx31GRI0RD
On a related note, if you get an email from “@BitGo” asking you to deposit BTC into an address starting with a 1… https://t.co/dQ7JQ1yCS7
@LarryBitcoin @rauchg Those are all valid concerns that I share, but it doesn’t mean BU as a concept is impossible a la “flat earth.”
@LarryBitcoin @rauchg Please don’t waste my time with rhetoric.
@1cyrilblanc1 @weedcoder @bitcoinyuri OK. Word of advice, though - you can make arguments without being so aggressive / negative.
@jimmysong @jonmatonis @MrHodl @rauchg Who “won” the Ethereum fork? 🤔
@LarryBitcoin @rauchg What are BU proponents claiming that is analogous to a “flat earth” argument?
@1cyrilblanc1 @weedcoder @bitcoinyuri It looks like the wikipedia author confused tamper evidence with modification resistance.
@1cyrilblanc1 @bitcoinyuri “Immutability” is hard to define. But no, not every use case needs Bitcoin’s security. https://t.co/r7M1WfvEXK
@bitcoinyuri I suspect they are a mix of scammers and victims. But they’re not a part of the Bitcoin community; we aren’t engaging them.
@1cyrilblanc1 @bitcoinyuri A blockchain is just a data structure. Its other properties depend upon your use case and threat model.
@1cyrilblanc1 @bitcoinyuri Who’s “redefining blockchain?”
@bitcoinyuri Not saying you should respect the opinion of idiots. Saying stereotyping an entire group as such is detrimental to discourse.
@rauchg Not necessarily; some see it as a way to resolve the gridlock of the current debate. It’s an act of frustration.
Honest humble hardworking people are on both sides of scaling debate. Also on both sides: dishonest malicious trolls. Focus on the former.
@ErikVoorhees @rogerkver Reddit divided into fiefdoms; I suggest seeking the Tao of Bitcoin instead of getting upset https://t.co/qq1wHVuNiP
@slushcz Not bad, though I’d say that this type of problem is begging to be solved with a MapReduce job - would be much more performant.
@jimmysong You mean off-chain solutions that don’t require SegWit, right?
@btc_joe My thesis is that because this is a political / personal issue now, the technical merits don’t make much difference.
@Peculiar_Dude Sure, here are some articles I’ve written:
https://t.co/3zfPCr8Kje
https://t.co/4XYdmZr0mW
https://t.co/2DKbJOkOTx
@poutintsev There are political and personal reasons. Also, BU gives more power to miners, thus it’s tantalizing.
5) As such, expect that the stalemate will be broken by one side, either via a hard fork or a user activated soft fork.
4) I suspect that neither Core nor Unlimited will reach their original desired hashrate targets.
3) Unlimited supporters will become increasingly incensed due to feeling that they are victims of attacks from “the other side.â€
2) SegWit supporters will become increasingly frustrated that miners are running unreliable software in production.
1) As more Bitcoin Unlimited vulnerabilities are exposed, the rift between the “sides” of the block size debate will widen.
@ARKblockchain @21 AFAIK @LukeDashjr’s counts are the most comprehensive.
@ARKblockchain @21 Node counts are tricky; a lot of people don’t realize that Bitnodes only counts reachable nodes accepting incoming conns.