”______ are trying to control Bitcoin!”
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io If you analyze the mempool and pay more than the current highest fee rate, it’s pretty likely. 😬
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io Perhaps you should make a list of recommended wallets that have user friendly fee handling.
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io In reality, the fee handling is a failure on part of wallets. Users shouldn’t have to know.
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io A user will plug in that static fee, then sometimes create a tx with many inputs that gets stuck.
@ErikVoorhees @ShapeShift_io Looks like you’re making some assumptions here. https://t.co/FZCpIm9E44
@riprowan @SatoshiLite They’re both flawed in the same way. I outlined the cure in my medium post.
@riprowan @SatoshiLite Meh, not exactly how I’d describe it. https://t.co/7zEcp8NkhZ https://t.co/OWVldUwpHK
@mriou To the… moon?
@brianchoffman Hmmmm wasn’t @NickSzabo4 an egg for several years?
@SatoshiLite Bahahaha; it’s a false dilemma regardless. No one needs to choose either.
https://t.co/HN6b9OKPvS updated to Bitcoin Core 0.14; new mempool persistence feature means no more metric cliffs w… https://t.co/EuaDkHt1tJ
@hitchslappy Well, larger legacy blocks and/or SegWit would reduce fees. Problem is 2nd layer isn’t ready yet.
@ollekullberg My point is more regarding dichotomy of exchange rate rise causing rise in transaction fees (even faster than exchange rate.)
![](http://pbs.twimg.com/media/C51jlbSVUAAsfqH.jpg:thumb)
It’s an odd combination of joy and disappointment, observing the gentrification of Bitcoin. pic.twitter.com/jRFhnagRBS