”______ are trying to control Bitcoin!”
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io If you analyze the mempool and pay more than the current highest fee rate, it’s pretty likely. 😬
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io Perhaps you should make a list of recommended wallets that have user friendly fee handling.
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io In reality, the fee handling is a failure on part of wallets. Users shouldn’t have to know.
@ErikVoorhees @theonevortex @ShapeShift_io A user will plug in that static fee, then sometimes create a tx with many inputs that gets stuck.
@ErikVoorhees @ShapeShift_io Looks like you’re making some assumptions here. https://t.co/FZCpIm9E44
@riprowan @SatoshiLite They’re both flawed in the same way. I outlined the cure in my medium post.
@riprowan @SatoshiLite Meh, not exactly how I’d describe it. https://t.co/7zEcp8NkhZ https://t.co/OWVldUwpHK
@mriou To the… moon?
@brianchoffman Hmmmm wasn’t @NickSzabo4 an egg for several years?
@SatoshiLite Bahahaha; it’s a false dilemma regardless. No one needs to choose either.
https://t.co/HN6b9OKPvS updated to Bitcoin Core 0.14; new mempool persistence feature means no more metric cliffs w… https://t.co/EuaDkHt1tJ
@hitchslappy Well, larger legacy blocks and/or SegWit would reduce fees. Problem is 2nd layer isn’t ready yet.
@ollekullberg My point is more regarding dichotomy of exchange rate rise causing rise in transaction fees (even faster than exchange rate.)
It’s an odd combination of joy and disappointment, observing the gentrification of Bitcoin. pic.twitter.com/jRFhnagRBS