@bgcarlisle Thanks; that was quite different from the average “blockchain expertise” that I’m usually asked to provide :-)
An academic paper about using blockchains to catch scientific misconduct may have been plagiarized. https://t.co/CmsKUI65oo
RT @BitGo: Not sure the banks are safe these days.
https://t.co/x67JPouVw3
RT @ryanxcharles: Why We’re Sticking With Bitcoin https://t.co/1nzRXKR9rR
@JohnCollins @Satoshi_N_ Did someone say “Magikarp?”
secparam Our new paper: Blind Offchain Lightweight Transactions (BOLT). Or how to do instant anonymous payments w/ #ZCash eprint.iacr.org/2016/701
Software bug results in @Citi considering 26,810 legitimate transactions over 15 years to be fake test transactions. https://t.co/rh1z3LMTUG
Academic papers citing Bitcoin:
2010: 5
2011: 12
2012: 56
2013: 106
2014: 332
2015: 407
2016: 196 (run rate of 370)
https://t.co/6hPKq1qGuo
Bankrupt @kncminer is still hashing post-halving, presumably because they’ve already paid for electricity / hosting. https://t.co/JLK1Gty59v
@alansilbert I just realized last night I got a call from them. My phone had blocked the marketing firm as spammers :-P