@NotABotQuiteYet Feel free to hit up the meetups https://t.co/eWeCdt6h89 https://t.co/zZFprtM1SU
@adam3us @moneytrigz The one with the most cumulative PoW; pretty much impossible for both to be the same.
@adam3us @brianchoffman @CharlieShrem @Excellion @_jonasschnelli_ @petertoddbtc Open invite! Super duper open! https://t.co/TMUhLlk2gH
@CharlieShrem @brianchoffman @adam3us @Excellion @_jonasschnelli_ @petertoddbtc Unfortunately my understanding is t… https://t.co/UMGGBPNXZe
@adam3us @moneytrigz SPV has a different security model; it cedes consensus rules to miners and thus blindly follows PoW.
@brianchoffman @adam3us @Excellion @_jonasschnelli_ @petertoddbtc You’re only a 3.5 hour drive from my range; come on down!
@adam3us @moneytrigz Correct, though only one will be acceptable to your node.
@Piotr14Tra @adam3us My reference was to “speaking from positions of authority” with regard to countering such authoritative claims.
@Piotr14Tra @adam3us In my experience, some people will regardless of if they’re countered. Just look at Paycoin, O… https://t.co/aofu2yhWw5
@adam3us Communication is certainly key; it need not be argumentative. We can inform users & empower them to make their own decisions.
@adam3us They can indeed hope, but too many of us are watching. The system is too transparent to fool the watchers.
@adam3us Anyone is free to leave of their own accord; no one can drag the unwilling along with them.
Net Neutrality is crony capitalism; claims “protection” from near monopolies w/a monopoly (govt.) We can do better; we can fix the Internet.
@nitroXplicit @adam3us Stooping to the level of such people is an unnecessary waste of resources. Let them spew their vitriol into the void.
@nitroXplicit @adam3us Oh, but it is… https://t.co/cvaeNTj5QC
@adam3us It’s about all debates turned toxic. A simple “no thank you” should suffice. 🙃
@KLoaec A coin by any other name would smell as sweet.
Drama instigators, reactionaries, and amplifiers waste our most valuable resource: time. It’s exactly what our comp… https://t.co/Pk8gsxQCgW
“If we change *foo* then it’s no longer Bitcoin!” No one has the authority to make such statements; you may only speak for yourself.
@adam3us @moneytrigz A node that isn’t feeding you a version of history that hasn’t been shared with the rest of the world.
@brianchoffman @adam3us @saifedean @arbedout @moneytrigz Pity the perpetually outraged, for they are trapped in a p… https://t.co/ziL7NW71b8
@brianchoffman @adam3us @saifedean @arbedout @moneytrigz IMO folks shouldn’t complain about github activity on othe… https://t.co/PyaYhhJukk
@windsok @_jonasschnelli_ Speculation; stick to facts.
@arbedout @cguida6 @adam3us @moneytrigz If a bootstrapping node has insufficient peers, it queries all DNS seeds. I… https://t.co/BQhmD2tkrz
@_jonasschnelli_ This isn’t the change; PR was closed.
RT @coindesk: Bitcoin and the Benefits of ‘Coopetition’ in Adversarial Environments https://t.co/lrUdRfJJp9 https://t.co/eWXfmXf4AQ
@eumartinez20 @moneytrigz @adam3us Give me a break; this is open source - there is no “exposure” of things occurring in public.
@adam3us @moneytrigz Bitcoin’s security model only requires that a bootstrapping peer manages to connect to a singl… https://t.co/oS5sb8hsDA
@adam3us @moneytrigz More seeds are better than fewer seeds.
@moneytrigz @adam3us Calm down; it was just a PR and wasn’t merged. Superceded by https://t.co/ACeqSB4RRh
@MrHodl What do you mean?
@LaurentMT Maybe it’s Craig’s turing complete automaton that died due to rising fees 🙄