The below is an off-site archive of all tweets posted by @lopp ever

January 30th, 2017

@AlpacaSW @juscamarena No, that entire thread is a trash fire. It’s also unprofessional for BU to put “Blockstream Core” vars in their code.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to AlpacaSW

@AlpacaSW There’s a big difference between civil intellectual debate and toxic fallacious “debate.” ihaveadreamshow.tv/7-ways-to-have…

via Twitter Web Client in reply to AlpacaSW

@MrHodl Context: Emergent Consensus is far few lines of code than Segregated Witness. It’s a factual statement regardless of other issues.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to MrHodl

@jwilkins By which you mean they should be considered more secure?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jwilkins

@AlpacaSW @seweso @rogerkver @gavinandresen I don’t know how to put this other than bluntly: referencing the HK Agreement is a waste of time

via Twitter Web Client in reply to AlpacaSW

@Excellion @gavinandresen You might regret being so gleeful about this… this story isn’t quite completed.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Excellion

@rogerkver @gavinandresen Couldn’t Bitcoin Classic and Unlimited add SegWit support so that we can move forward constructively?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to rogerkver

@MrChrisEllis I don’t think putting quotes around “Blockstream Core” makes it any less insulting to all Core devs, Blockstream & otherwise.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to MrChrisEllis

@HostFat That wasn’t my claim. My point was that the user’s choice in the market for consensus rules is a wider variety than often discussed

via Twitter Web Client in reply to HostFat

@flyosity I’m holding out for Triple Coupon Wednesdays!

via Twitter Web Client in reply to flyosity

@ErikVoorhees The real question is how folks feel about leaving the “literally never” crowd behind.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to ErikVoorhees

Consensus market isn’t Core vs Unlimited, it’s:
Core, Knots, NBitcoin, Bcoin, BTCD, libbitcoin, Toshi, Haskoin
vs Unlimited, Classic
vs XT

via Twitter Web Client

@GlobalMacroBot To let “the free market” determine the block size limit dynamically.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to GlobalMacroBot

@adam3us It’s hard to quantify. I do believe “meatspace consensus” provides a strong safety net, but each fallback to it erodes user trust.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to adam3us

@TuurDemeester There was a pull request, but as far as I can tell that specific change wasn’t discussed…twitter.com/i/web/status/8…5h

via Twitter Web Client in reply to TuurDemeester

61% of reachable BU nodes will reach chain consensus in ~40 minutes.
24% are configured to stay out of consensus fo..twitter.com/i/web/status/8…A3

via Twitter Web Client

coindesk Ledger’s new hardware wallet is the most costly on the market. Is it worth the extra cash? Jameson Lopp investigates coindesk.com/review-putting…

via Buffer (retweeted on 10:09 AM, Jan 30th, 2017 via Twitter for Android)

When your premise is that human consensus is sufficiently reliable to trust, machine consensus becomes less valuable twitter.com/murchandamus/s…

via Twitter Web Client